Process discovery that finds the real bottlenecks without weeks of workshops.

When you've committed to an AI rollout and need to show it is working, Workstuff speaks to the people on the ground and comes back with the use cases worth building and the evidence to measure the change.

Trusted by global engineering companies, training firms, and consultancies.

ExpleoKyndrylEaton SquareImpetusAngel Invest
What we hear from AI automation leaders

“We're automating a process before we know how it really runs.”

“

There's a date on the wall for the first agents, and I need to know how 200 reps actually run their deals and where the pipeline leaks before we build any of it. Not the playbook version, the real one. There's one of me, and the calendars alone would take a quarter.

Revenue operations director, enterprise software
“

We were about to automate a process off an SOP somebody wrote two years ago. The people doing the job say it isn't how the work actually runs, but nobody had ever asked them.

Operations director, financial services
The solution

An AI interviewer that finds the use cases worth building, and the evidence to measure the change.

  • Send a link. 100 people talk through how the work really gets done, and the AI probes for detail.
  • Your questions guide the interviews. Workstuff reconciles every account into one version, and flags where they clash.
  • When the build team asks how the process runs, you have the answer, with a name attached.
An AI-led interview running on a phone, by voice or text

100 people interviewed in 6 days. No meetings booked.

100People interviewed
6 daysTo a full library
Every answerTraced to who said it
Build-readyA spec, not a slide deck

See which processes are actually ready.

AI agents are good at following a clear process; they cannot invent one. Turn the interviews into a scored view of every process: documented steps, an owner for every decision, and a known list of exceptions, including the work that never made it into the SOP. You know which one to automate first, and which one will bite you.

Process health scored across steps, decisions, exceptions and readiness to automate

And how the work actually gets done.

Not one person's version. Every account of the same process, reconciled into one map. Where people agreed, it is settled. Where they did not, you see both versions rather than the loudest one.

A current-state process map with numbered steps, a loop and a revenue leak
01

Process steps

What actually happens, in order, including the step that never made it into the SOP.

02

Decisions

Who decides, on what basis, and who they go and ask when they aren't sure.

03

Exceptions

The cases that don't follow the rule. The ones that break an agent on its first day.

04

Pains

Where the work is slow, done twice, or quietly hated by everyone doing it.

05

Ideas

What the people doing the job would fix first, which nobody has ever asked them.

The difference

The same process, two very different builds.

Build from an SOP somebody wrote two years ago
↓
Build from what the people doing the job said last week
Discovery quality depends on which analyst you can spare
↓
Your best analyst's method in every conversation, whoever runs it
Debrief after every workshop and hope the notes are good
↓
Every conversation comes back structured: the steps, the decisions, the exceptions
Ship the agent and find the edge cases in production
↓
Know the exceptions before anyone writes a line of it
Send a survey, get a 20% response rate, get charts
↓
Send a link, get 80% completion, get the story behind the numbers
Every process starts from scratch
↓
Every process builds on the library you already have

Show the AI program is real: use cases identified, change measured.

Book a demo and we'll walk you through a real capture: the steps, the decisions, and the exceptions that would have broken the build.

Book a demo →